Starten Sie Ihre Suche...


Durch die Nutzung unserer Webseite erklären Sie sich damit einverstanden, dass wir Cookies verwenden. Weitere Informationen

Personalized treatment selection in routine care: Integrating machine learning and statistical algorithms to recommend cognitive behavioral or psychodynamic therapy

Psychotherapy Research. Bd. 31. H. 1. Informa UK Limited 2020 S. 33 - 51

Erscheinungsjahr: 2020

Publikationstyp: Zeitschriftenaufsatz

Sprache: Englisch

Doi/URN: 10.1080/10503307.2020.1769219

Volltext über DOI/URN

Inhaltszusammenfassung


Objective: This study aims at developing a treatment selection algorithm using a combination of machine learning and statistical inference to recommend patients’ optimal treatment based on their pre-treatment characteristics. Methods: A disorder-heterogeneous, naturalistic sample of N = 1,379 outpatients treated with either cognitive behavioral therapy or psychodynamic therapy was analyzed. Based on a combination of random forest and linear regression, differential treatment response was mode...Objective: This study aims at developing a treatment selection algorithm using a combination of machine learning and statistical inference to recommend patients’ optimal treatment based on their pre-treatment characteristics. Methods: A disorder-heterogeneous, naturalistic sample of N = 1,379 outpatients treated with either cognitive behavioral therapy or psychodynamic therapy was analyzed. Based on a combination of random forest and linear regression, differential treatment response was modeled in the training data (n = 966) to indicate each individual’s optimal treatment. A separate holdout dataset (n = 413) was used to evaluate personalized recommendations. Results: The difference in outcomes between patients treated with their optimal vs. non-optimal treatment was significant in the training data, but non-significant in the holdout data (b = –0.043, p = .280). However, for the 50% of patients with the largest predicted benefit of receiving their optimal treatment, the average percentage of change on the BSI in the holdout data was 52.6% for their optimal and 38.4% for their non-optimal treatment (p = .017; d = 0.33 [0.06, 0.61]). Conclusion: A treatment selection algorithm based on a combination of ML and statistical inference might improve treatment outcome for some, but not all outpatients and could support therapists’ clinical decision-making.» weiterlesen» einklappen

Autoren


Schwartz, Brian (Autor)
Cohen, Zachary D. (Autor)
Rubel, Julian A. (Autor)
Zimmermann, Dirk (Autor)
Wittmann, Werner W. (Autor)

Klassifikation


DDC Sachgruppe:
Psychologie

Verknüpfte Personen


Beteiligte Einrichtungen