Starten Sie Ihre Suche...


Durch die Nutzung unserer Webseite erklären Sie sich damit einverstanden, dass wir Cookies verwenden. Weitere Informationen

Feedback-informed treatment versus usual psychological treatment for depression and anxiety: a multisite, open-label, cluster randomised controlled trial

LANCET PSYCHIATRY. Bd. 5. H. 7. 2018 S. 564 - 572

Erscheinungsjahr: 2018

Publikationstyp: Zeitschriftenaufsatz

Doi/URN: 10.1016/S2215-0366(18)30162-7

Volltext über DOI/URN

GeprüftBibliothek

Inhaltszusammenfassung


Background Previous research suggests that the use of outcome feedback technology can enable psychological therapists to identify and resolve obstacles to clinical improvement. We aimed to assess the effectiveness of an outcome feedback quality assurance system applied in stepped care psychological services. Methods This multisite, open-label, cluster randomised controlled trial was done at eight National Health Service (NHS) Trusts in England, involving therapists who were qualified to deliv...Background Previous research suggests that the use of outcome feedback technology can enable psychological therapists to identify and resolve obstacles to clinical improvement. We aimed to assess the effectiveness of an outcome feedback quality assurance system applied in stepped care psychological services. Methods This multisite, open-label, cluster randomised controlled trial was done at eight National Health Service (NHS) Trusts in England, involving therapists who were qualified to deliver evidence-based low-intensity or high-intensity psychological interventions. Adult patients (18 years or older) who accessed individual therapy with participating therapists were eligible for inclusion, except patients who accessed group therapies and those who attended less than two individual therapy sessions. Therapists were randomly assigned (1:1) to an outcome feedback intervention group or a treatment-as-usual control group by use of a computer-generated randomisation algorithm. The allocation of patients to therapists was quasi-random, whereby patients on waiting lists were allocated sequentially on the basis of therapist availability. All patients received low-intensity (less than eight sessions) or high-intensity (up to 20 sessions) psychological therapies for the duration of the 1-year study period. An automated computer algorithm alerted therapists in the outcome feedback group to patients who were not on track, and primed them to review these patients in clinical supervision. The primary outcome was symptom severity on validated depression (Patient Health Questionnaire-9 [PHQ-9]) and anxiety (Generalised Anxiety Disorder-7 [GAD-7]) measures after treatment of varying durations, which were compared between groups with multilevel modelling, controlling for cluster (therapist) effects. We used an intention-to-treat approach. This trial was prospectively registered with ISRCTN, number » weiterlesen» einklappen

Autoren


Delgadillo, Jaime (Autor)
de Jong, Kim (Autor)
Lucock, Mike (Autor)
Rubel, Julian (Autor)
Gilbody, Simon (Autor)
Ali, Shehzad (Autor)
Aguirre, Elisa (Autor)
Appleton, Mark (Autor)
Nevin, Jacqueline (Autor)
O'Hayon, Harry (Autor)
Patel, Ushma (Autor)
Sainty, Andrew (Autor)
Spencer, Peter (Autor)
McMillan, Dean (Autor)

Verknüpfte Personen


Beteiligte Einrichtungen