Starten Sie Ihre Suche...


Durch die Nutzung unserer Webseite erklären Sie sich damit einverstanden, dass wir Cookies verwenden. Weitere Informationen

Red Color and Risk-Taking Behavior in Online Environments

PLOS ONE. Bd. 10. H. 7. 2015

Erscheinungsjahr: 2015

ISBN/ISSN: 1932-6203

Publikationstyp: Zeitschriftenaufsatz

Doi/URN: 10.1371/journal.pone.0134033

Volltext über DOI/URN

GeprüftBibliothek

Inhaltszusammenfassung


In many situations red is associated with hazard and danger. As a consequence, it was expected that task-irrelevant color cues in online environments would affect risk-taking behaviors. This assumption was tested in two web-based experiments. The first study (N = 383) demonstrated that in risky choice dilemmas respondents preferred the less risky option when the displayed university logo was in red (versus gray); but only when both choice alternatives were at least moderately risky. The secon...In many situations red is associated with hazard and danger. As a consequence, it was expected that task-irrelevant color cues in online environments would affect risk-taking behaviors. This assumption was tested in two web-based experiments. The first study (N = 383) demonstrated that in risky choice dilemmas respondents preferred the less risky option when the displayed university logo was in red (versus gray); but only when both choice alternatives were at least moderately risky. The second study (N = 144) replicated these results with a behavioral outcome: Respondents showed more cautious behavior in a web-based game when the focal stimuli were colored red (versus blue). Together, these findings demonstrate that variations in the color design of a computerized environment affect risk taking: Red color leads to more conservative choices and behaviors. » weiterlesen» einklappen

Autoren


Gnambs, Timo (Autor)
Oeberst, Aileen (Autor)

Verknüpfte Personen