Starten Sie Ihre Suche...


Durch die Nutzung unserer Webseite erklären Sie sich damit einverstanden, dass wir Cookies verwenden. Weitere Informationen

Task relevance determines binding of effect features in action planning

Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics. Bd. 82. Springer Science and Business Media LLC 2020 32914340

Erscheinungsjahr: 2020

Publikationstyp: Zeitschriftenaufsatz (Elektronische Ressource)

Sprache: Englisch

Doi/URN: 10.3758/s13414-020-02123-x

Volltext über DOI/URN

Inhaltszusammenfassung


Action planning can be construed as the temporary binding of features of perceptual action effects. While previous research demonstrated binding for task-relevant, body-related effect features, the role of task-irrelevant or environment-related effect features in action planning is less clear. Here, we studied whether task-relevance or body-relatedness determines feature binding in action planning. Participants planned an action A, but before executing it initiated an intermediate action B. E...Action planning can be construed as the temporary binding of features of perceptual action effects. While previous research demonstrated binding for task-relevant, body-related effect features, the role of task-irrelevant or environment-related effect features in action planning is less clear. Here, we studied whether task-relevance or body-relatedness determines feature binding in action planning. Participants planned an action A, but before executing it initiated an intermediate action B. Each action relied on a body-related effect feature (index vs. middle finger movement) and an environment-related effect feature (cursor movement towards vs. away from a reference object). In Experiments 1 and 2, both effects were task-relevant. Performance in action B suffered from partial feature overlap with action A compared to full feature repetition or alternation, which is in line with binding of both features while planning action A. Importantly, this cost disappeared when all features were available but only body-related features were task-relevant (Experiment 3). When only the environment-related effect of action A was known in advance, action B benefitted when it aimed at the same (vs. a different) environment-related effect (Experiment 4). Consequently, the present results support the idea that task relevance determines whether binding of body-related and environment-related effect features takes place while the pre-activation of environment-related features without binding them primes feature-overlapping actions. » weiterlesen» einklappen

  • Action planning
  • Binding
  • Effect anticipations
  • Motor control.

Autoren


Mocke, Viola (Autor)
Weller, Lisa (Autor)
Rothermund, Klaus (Autor)
Kunde, Wilfried (Autor)

Klassifikation


DDC Sachgruppe:
Psychologie

Verknüpfte Personen


Christian Frings

Beteiligte Einrichtungen