Differences in the strength of distractor inhibition do not affect distractor–response bindings
Memory & Cognition. Bd. 40. H. 3. Springer Nature 2011 S. 373 - 387
Erscheinungsjahr: 2011
Publikationstyp: Zeitschriftenaufsatz
Sprache: Deutsch
Doi/URN: 10.3758/s13421-011-0157-1
Inhaltszusammenfassung
Distractor inhibition and distractor–response binding were investigated in two experiments by analyzing distractor repetition benefits and their interaction with response repetition effects in a sequential-priming paradigm. Distractor repetition benefits were larger for distractors that were incompatible with the to-be-executed response (task-related distractors) than for distractors that were not assigned to a response (neutral distractors), indicating that the strength of distractor inhibit...Distractor inhibition and distractor–response binding were investigated in two experiments by analyzing distractor repetition benefits and their interaction with response repetition effects in a sequential-priming paradigm. Distractor repetition benefits were larger for distractors that were incompatible with the to-be-executed response (task-related distractors) than for distractors that were not assigned to a response (neutral distractors), indicating that the strength of distractor inhibition was a function of response interference for the distractors. In contrast, the distractor–response bindings were found to be of equal strength for both task-related and neutral distractors. Thus, differences in the strengths of distractor inhibition did not affect the integration of distractors with responses into event files. Instead, our results suggest that distractor–response binding and distractor inhibition are independent mechanisms that are recruited for the automatization of behavior and action control.» weiterlesen» einklappen
Klassifikation
DDC Sachgruppe:
Psychologie